From TheBestLinks.com
Hello there Khendon, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. BTW, thanks for starting the David Gemmell article. Cheers! --maveric149
Thanks :-) -- Khendon
Hi there. regarding your comment on Talk:List of time periods -- "I *will* start looking at linked pages before spending ages entering lots of data" -- I think most wikipedians have made that mistake before ... it's a good idea to do a search before creating new pages too. Hope it hasn't put you off. cheers -- Tarquin 09:30 Sep 17, 2002 (UTC)
Hi Khendon!
Thanks for taking a look at the Military science page, you comments really help. Feel like taking a crack at War, I'm gonna need the help!
Dobbs 15:12 Sep 25, 2002 (UTC)
hmmm...military equipement is not exactly the same as weapon...transport vehicles, barracks and other installations, for example....--AN 12:25 Sep 26, 2002 (UTC)
- I know - but the redirect for Military technology and equipment was
- already to Weapon, so I was trying to retain consistency. Weapon
- has a list that includes things that aren't strictly speaking weapons,
- anyway. - Khendon 13:49 Sep 26, 2002 (UTC)
Hi Kendon !
Good work with the tabulation of (anti-)metrication arguments. I had the same idea just yesterday but hesitated actually doing it... you beat me ! --FvdP 12:44 Oct 3, 2002 (UTC)
Khendon, please stop being mean to Easter. He is a new user, and a celebrity in his own right.
I would prefer that you discuss any further changes in the talk pages, about Prince's racial identity, rather than reverting Easter's changes. Let's come to a consensus, based on mutual understanding. --Ed Poor
I only actually reverted the change the first time. The other edits were
all rephrasings which I hoped would be acceptable. It certainly wasn't
my intention to be "mean", and I still don't think I was being, but
I accept your point that it could be interpreted as such. - Khendon 08:24 Oct 10, 2002 (UTC)
What's up Khendon! I hope you work on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict page. It needs serious work. I believe your compassion will help correct the page's poor interpretation. Good luck :)
- Peacemaker
Thanks for deleting Two16's "comment" on the village pump.
If it wasn't so bizarre it would be really really funny. :-) --mav
Hi, not quite sure what you've done with Military units - have you seen the page Military unit? charlieF 16:55 Mar 24, 2003 (UTC)
- On a related note - I see you're interested in lots of the military stuff. I've created a new page at British Army/Structure with links to most of the divisions and brigades. I'm assuming that brigades aren't numbered sequentially because some of them are now defunct - do you know if this is true? Also, there's a shedload of regiments that aren't listed on this page - if you can think of a `pretty' way of displaying them that doesn't turn the page into another list... :) charlieF 11:01 Mar 25, 2003 (UTC)
Good stuff :-) I've moved it to Structure of the British Army since
page names with slashes are deprecated AIUI - Khendon 11:21 Mar 25, 2003 (UTC)
- Hmmm, I've got to say that I disagree with the way you shifted the table from Military unit to Structure of the United States Armed Forces. For a start, the table lists Military units, whereas a page on the structure of the US armed forces should describe the various corps, regiments etc, imho (much as Structure of the British Army does). If you think that the table is overly us-centric, could I suggest that you/I/someone edits it for British (and any other country, if wanted) and puts it back in Military units? The reason I created the table in the first place was to provide a quick summary of the relative sizes and structure of an army! charlieF 12:22 Mar 25, 2003 (UTC)
I think if we want a table for comparing relative shapes and sizes, it'll
have to be simplified considerably. - Khendon
Hi there, you have been listed as "inactive" on Wikipedia:Administrators. Please remove the notice when it is out of date. Cheers, Cyan 01:36, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
(sniffle) How sad :-) Hopefully one day I'll be back... -- Khendon 08:15, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
FYI, you may be interested in the changes made to SA80 where I moved the better history to Assault rifle. -- Fuzheado 01:10, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Related links
Top visited
0 of
0 links
[no links posted yet]
>> place link >>
Discussion
Last posted
0 of
0 messages
[no messages posted yet]
>> post message >>
Watch
You can
add this article to your own "watchlist" and receive e-mail notification about all changes in this page.
