From TheBestLinks.com
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or drop me a line. BTW nice work on the squid article. Cheers! --maveric149
Thanks for edit of Nazism. I liked the comment about plural nouns! <GRIN> It's that public school education..... Dobbs 02:36 Oct 30, 2002 (UTC)
I feel your deletion of my type checking explanation was a bit extreme. The section specifically dealt with how python does type checking, and provided a great comparison to another language.
user_Talk:hfastedge
栃肥況混 (horse+dung+situation+confuse) -豎眩
it takes a lot more justification to delete something than add. what i've added is not garbage that you can just label as cleaning up. re python.
its time for you to respond at my talk page. the conversation should stay in one area, there. i replied minutes after you did, which was 10 days ago.
responded at python discuss now, just like you wanted. --user_Talk:hfastedge
Thanks for cleaning up phreaking. It was unnerving to see two parts of the article contradict each other. Paullusmagnus 22:24, 5 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Hi,
instead of blanking articles like clogging, please list them on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. This ensures that they don't linger in the database for months without being detected. Thanks.—Eloquence 07:44, Aug 7, 2003 (UTC)
Over at VfD User:Mintguy mentioned that you had grown frustrated by some controversial edits to some computing articles. In response, there's now a new Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing and Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/Controversial articles to help form consensus on computing topics. Please consider watching the talk pages there and using them to let others know of issues you believe merit peer review. JamesDay 15:49, 28 Oct 2003 (UTC)
On the Interrupt page, you changed my Computer Science to Computer Engineering. As a computer engineering major (which means this hits close to home), I say ketchup, catsup (*GRIN*)
Seriously, you learn about interrupts in both. More so in architecture, but also in any operating systems class as well. Regardless, your edit is fine by me. --Raul654 04:51, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Your commentary on Talk:Datatype was enlightening and insightful, and I was just about to make the same points myself, so I implemented some of your ideas in the article. Kudos to you, I say! :) Dysprosia 22:16, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I wish to remind you that personal attacks such as the one you made against User:Mr-Natural-Health, on the page Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Theresa knott vs. Mr-Natural-Health, calling him a stupid pig, using the language, "it is against my policy to attempt to teach a pig to sing. [1] (http://www.cantrip.org/stupidity.html)" is contrary to well-established Wikipedia policy. Fred Bauder 12:09, Mar 28, 2004 (UTC)
Wikicode
Hi! I noticed you've contributed to computer science articles. I've started a project on WikiProject Computing to propose a standard pseudocode for use throughout the Wikipedia that I call wikicode. Please join the WikiProject (no commitment required) and please participate in the discussion about wikicode. Thanks!
Derrick Coetzee 16:52, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
I am no mathematician, but it would be useful to see in this article what distinction is being made between "almost everywhere" and "everywhere". Does the latter apply to neighborhoods rather than elements? --FOo 20:47, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- The only way I see to construe the first sentence of this article as failing to answer this question is to think that "null set" means "empty set", which is how it is defined in many books, so the sentence is confusing. I've corrected it. Michael Hardy 00:44, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I am no mathematician, but it would be useful to see in this article what distinction is being made between "almost everywhere" and "everywhere". Does the latter apply to neighborhoods rather than elements? --FOo 20:47, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- The only way I see to construe the first sentence of this article as failing to answer this question is to think that "null set" means "empty set", which is how it is defined in many books, so the sentence is confusing. I've corrected it. Michael Hardy 00:44, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Stop!
Kindly refrain for 48 hours from any further action concerning either Marcel Cerdan or Sendmail or their talk pages. Due temporarily inconsistent data, which can be expected to resolve within that time frame, you have no idea what you are messing with. (Your edit may be harmless, but don't tempt fate. The situation is likely to be over your head without an hour's study, but if you're really that interested i'll steer you there.) Thanks for your concern, and TIA, --Jerzy(t) 20:01, 2004 Aug 18 (UTC)
- That was not very coherent. Since Talk:Sendmail is no longer an incorrect redirect, I'm not going to do anything now anyhow. --FOo 22:18, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
[The following was written while you were entering your response; please ask a question if it doesn't help.]
Thank you for your patient restraint. The server's background activity following up on the deletion, move, and undeletion has completed, and those operations are now fully effective, so i finished the job, including cleaning up Talk:Sendmail. Some of what you'll see on those pages will make more sense in light of Wikipedia:How to fix cut and paste moves (even tho that title does not describe this situation).
I'll offer three tips (not so much for the future avoidance of similar situations -- since the conditions that led you into it are so rare -- as for their value in a large number of more frequent situations).
- The move tool precisely formats the summary entry for the "edit" of a page into a move-tool-generated redirect, and that format should make you ask yourself, of a "nonsense" redir, "what kind of move would have led to this redir? (Or "why would someone forge such a link and summary?"; if you came up with a theory that you think that applied to, i doubt your response was approriate to that situation.)
- Blanking a page is almost never an appropriate edit, to the extent that i had never seen a blank page in nearly 7500 edits, and had to stop and think about whether i was seeing that or some kind of malfunction. Believing that being blank would a better state for a page is probably a good rule of thumb for when it should be added to VfD. A more sensible response to a nonsense link would be a counter-move (which, if it succeeds, proves that you've put things back to where they were before the "nonsense" started.
- Editing a page consisting of a (non-forged) move-tool-generated redir is always destructive, and thus should be done only when you are sure what's going on. (Probably by asking.) Once you do so, the move can never be truly reversed (except at the cost of abusing a developer), so in practice repair would have to be by essentially the repair procedure for a cut-and-paste move.
In any case, all my concerns about the possibility of irreverisible damage are over, and please feel at home with those pages if your interest continues.
--Jerzy(t) 23:01, 2004 Aug 18 (UTC)
Re: your question on my talk page. My only edit to this page was a disambiguation for the link to 'square'. I'm afraid I'm not interested in a debate on the actual content of the article.
Best, mat_x 08:08, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
You may want to state your case here--FeloniousMonk 17:51, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Related links
Top visited
0 of
0 links
[no links posted yet]
>> place link >>
Discussion
Last posted
0 of
0 messages
[no messages posted yet]
>> post message >>
Watch
You can
add this article to your own "watchlist" and receive e-mail notification about all changes in this page.
