From TheBestLinks.com
The Nuremberg Trials is the general name for two sets of trials of Nazis involved in World War II and the Holocaust. The trials were held in the German city of Nuremberg from 1945 to 1949 at the Nuremberg Palace of Justice (the only court in Germany large enough to host the event that had not been destroyed by Allied bombing). The first and most famous of these trials was the Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal or IMT, which tried twenty-four of the most important captured (or still believed to be alive) leaders of Nazi Germany. It was held from November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946. The second set of trials were of lesser war criminals under Control Council Law No. 10, including the famous Doctors' Trial. The majority of this article deals with the IMT.
Creation of the court
At the meetings in Teheran (1943), Yalta (1945) and Potsdam (1945), the three major wartime powers USA, USSR and Britain agreed on the format to punish those responsible for war-crimes during World War II. France was also awarded a place on the tribunal.
The legal basis for the trial was established by the 'London Charter', issued on August 8, 1945. Some 200 German war crimes defendants were tried at Nuremberg, and 1,600 others were tried under the traditional channels of military justice. The
legal basis for the jurisdiction of the court was that by the Instrument of Surrender of Germany,
political authority for Germany had been transferred to the Allied Control Council which having
sovereign power over Germany could choose to punish violations of international law and the laws of war.
Because the court was limited to violations of the laws of war, it did not have jurisdiction over crimes
that took place before the outbreak of war on September 1, 1939.
Location
The Soviet Union had wanted the trials to take place in Berlin, however Nuremberg was chosen as the site for the trials for specific reasons:
- convenient location in the American sector (at this time, Germany was divided into four sectors)
- the Palace of Justice was spacious and largely undamaged. A large prison was also part of the complex
- because Nuremberg had been appointed "City of the party rallies", there was symbolic value in making it the place of the party's demise.
It was also agreed that Berlin would become the permanent seat of the IMT and that the first trial (several were planned) would take place in Nuremberg. Because of the Cold War there were no subsequent trials.
Participants
Each of the four countries provided one judge and an alternate; and the prosecutors. The judges were:
The chief American prosecutor was Robert H. Jackson. The chief British prosecutor was Hartley Shawcross.
The validity of the court
- The defendants were not allowed to appeal or affect the selection of judges. Some people argue that, because the judges were appointed by the victors, the Tribunal was not impartial and could not be regarded as a court in the true sense. A.L. Goodheart, Professor at Oxford, opposed this view, writing:
- "Attractive as this argument may sound in theory, it ignores the fact that it runs counter to the administration of law in every country. If it were true then no spy could be given a legal trial, because his case is always heard by judges representing the enemy country. Yet no one has ever argued that in such cases it was necessary to call on neutral judges. The prisoner has the right to demand that his judges shall be fair, but not that they shall be neutral. As Lord Writ has pointed out, the same principle is applicable to ordinary criminal law because 'a burglar cannot complain that he is being tried by a jury of honest citizens." The Legality of the Nuremberg Trials, Juridical Review, April 1946
- The trials were conducted under their own rules of evidence; the indictments were created ex post facto and were not based on any nation's law; the tu quoque defense was removed; and the entire spirit of the assembly was "victor's justice".
All this did little to help the credibility of trials. But the spirit of the time was well reflected at Nuremberg - a long, brutal and extraordinarily costly war had been fought and the surviving leaders of the losing side could not expect to simply walk away from the disaster they had created. Although international law at the time already defined targeting of civilians as a war crime, and massive bombings of civilians like the fire-bombing of Dresden that killed ca. 30,000 civilians or the fire-bombing of Tokyo that killed ca. 100,000 civilians, were never tried, nor were other alleged war crimes of the allied countries such as unrestricted warfare in the Pacific, attacking submarines displaying Red Cross flags in the Laconia incident, or mistreatment of prisoners of war.
The main trial
Defendants in the dock - Front row: Göring, Hess, von Ribbentrop, and Keitel. Second row: Dönitz, Raeder, Schirach, Sauckel.
The International Military Tribunal was opened on October 18, 1945, in the Supreme Court Building in Berlin. The first session was presided over by the Soviet judge, Nikitchenko. The prosecution entered indictments against 24 major war criminals and six criminal organizations - the leadership of the Nazi party, the SS and SD, the Gestapo, the SA and the High Command of the German army (OKW). The indictments were for:
- Conspiracy to commit crimes against peace
- Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression
- War crimes
- Crimes against humanity
The twenty-four accused were:
"I" indicted "G" indicted and found guilty "º" Not Charged
The definition of what constitutes a war crime is described by the Nuremberg Principles, a document which was created as a result of the trial. The medical experiments conducted by German doctors led to the creation of the Nuremberg Code to control future trials involving human subjects, and the so-called Doctors' Trial.
Influence on the development of international criminal law
The Nuremberg trials had a great influence on the development of international criminal law. The International Law Commission, acting on the request of the United Nations General Assembly, produced in 1950 the report Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal (Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1950, vol. III). The influence of the tribunal can also be seen in the proposals for a permanent international criminal court, and the drafting of international criminal codes, later prepared by the International Law Commission.
The Nuremberg trials initiated a movement for the prompt establishment of a permanent international criminal court, eventually leading over fifty years later to the adoption of the Statute of the International Criminal Court.
See also
External links
de:Nürnberger Prozesse
es:Juicios de Nuremberg
fr:procès de Nuremberg
he:משפטי נירנברג
it:Processo di Norimberga
ja:ニュルンベルク裁判
nl:Processen van Neurenberg
pl:Międzynarodowy Trybunał Wojskowy w Norymberdze
sv:Nürnbergprocessen
ar:Ù…Øاكم_نورمبرغ
Related links
Top visited
0 of
0 links
[no links posted yet]
>> place link >>
Discussion
Last posted
0 of
0 messages
[no messages posted yet]
>> post message >>
Watch
You can
add this article to your own "watchlist" and receive e-mail notification about all changes in this page.
