From TheBestLinks.com
Competition characterises a biochemical, ecologic, economic, political, or sporting activity whereby two or more individuals or groups strive antagonistically against one another for some reward. The reward could consist of:
- fame, esteem, reputation, or recognition
- money, objects of value, or resources
- territory, food, or nesting sites
- market share, or business dominance
- power and influence
- belonging and membership
- mates and reproductive success
- quality, improvement, and achievement
- spirtual enlightenment or salvation
- self-actualization
When rewards are intangible, a trophy is often given to symbolize the achievement and make the rewards tangible.
Competition exists at the particular level as well as the systemic level. At the particular level, individuals or groups compete against each other either informally or in formal contests. At the systemic level whole societies are organized in such a way as to promote competition, usually by offering incentives.
Competition is able to push us to great heights. It prods us to achieve more than what we could without it. It is not the only stimulous for achievement, of course: People can also be encouraged to succeed through a desire to cooperate, a love for what the're doing, and possibly even coersion.
Competition can also have negative consequences. Potential detrimental effects include:
- We are blinded to other strategies - A species can pursue a competitive strategy in a situation where a cooperative strategy might be more beneficial.
- It can promote excessive concentration on achievement - For example athletes push themselves to the point that they do harm to their bodies. Another example is people that spent so much time at work that they do themselves and their families damage.
- There are financial costs - All competition involves the expenditure of energy and resources. Elections for example, are very costly competitions. In the business world, the Coke/Pepsi wars of the 1980s and 90s is an example of a multi-million dollar contests that provided neither contestant a significant advantage. Sporting games can also be very expensive to stage.
- It can result in a loss of moral direction - In sports, use of steroids is an example of competition eroding the contestants' moral compass. An example is Enron, a corporate environment so competitive that its cutthroat atmosphere was a leading factor in its demise.
In economics and business
Seen as a pillar of capitalism in that it may stimulate innovation, encourage efficiency or drive down prices, it is the foundation upon which capitalism is justified. According to microeconomic theory, no system of resource allocation is more efficient than pure competition. Competition, according to the theory causes firms to develop new products and technologies. This gives consumers greater selection and better products. The greater selection typically causes lower prices for the products compared to what the price would be if there was no competition (monopoly) or little competition (oligopoly).
However, competition may equally lead to wasted (duplicated) effort and to increased costs (and prices) in some circumstances. Similarly, the psychological effects of competition may result in harm as well as good.
Marketers have identified 3 levels of competition. The most narrow form is direct competition (also called category competition or brand competition). This is where products that perform the same function compete against each other. For example, a Ford pick-up truck competes with a Toyota pick-up truck which competes with a Volvo pick-up truck. The next form is substitute competition. Products that are close substitutes for one another compete. For example, butters compete with margerines, which compete with mayonaises, which compete with various sauces and spreads. The broadest form of competition is typically called budget competition. Encluded in this category is anything that the consumer might want to spend their available money on. For example, a family that has $20,000 may choose to spend it on a new car, a boat, an addition to their house, or on their childs education. These purchases can be seen as competing with each other for the family's available money.
Competition need not be between companies. Business writers sometimes refer to "internal competition". This is competition within companies. First introduced by Alfred Sloan at General Motors in the 1920s, he deliberately created areas of overlap between divisions of the company so that each division would be competing with the other divisions. For example, the Chevy division may compete with the Pontiac division for some market segments. In 1931 Proctor and Gamble initiated a deliberate system of internal brand vs brand rivalry. The company was organized around brands, with each brand allocated resources, including a dedicated group of employees willing to champion the brand. Each brand manager was given responsibility for the success or failure of the brand and was compensated accordingly. Most businesses also encourage competition between individual employees. An example of this is a contest between sales representatives. The sales rep with the highest sales (or the best improvement in sales) over the period of the contest, would win a paid vacation, or some other prize.
In biology and ecology
Organisms compete for scarce resources such as food, water, mates, and territory. An acorn that falls to the forest floor, for example, must compete with other plants for nutrient-rich soil, water, and adequate sunlight.
In politics
Democracy is essentially the institutionalization of competition. An election is a competition. The winner of the competition attains power for a short time, that is, untill the next competition.
In sports
Some "sporting activities", such as fishing for example, can be viewed as primarily recreational rather than sporting, however true sports are competitive. The most proficient atheletes like to compare their skills with others in competition. The ultimate sporting competition is the Olympics.
In psychology, sociology, and anthropology
Social psychologists study the nature of competition. They want to know why we compete and under what circumstances. They study group dynamics to detect how competition emerges and what its effects are.
Sociologists study what effect competition has on society as a whole. When is it beneficial, and when harmful.
Anthropologists study the history and prehistory of competition in various cultures. They ask, How did it manifest itself in different cultural settings in the past.
Compare
See also
da:Konkurrence
de:Wettbewerb
gl:Competición
Related links
Top visited
0 of
0 links
[no links posted yet]
>> place link >>
Discussion
Last posted
0 of
0 messages
[no messages posted yet]
>> post message >>
Watch
You can
add this article to your own "watchlist" and receive e-mail notification about all changes in this page.
